RFD: news.admin.moderation moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS)

[Terminator]

Dropped in here to see if there had been any improvements, to find this
brain-dead proposal from the usual suspects. It's hard to know where
Discussion of whether moderation is good/bad is explicitly banned, BUT
discussion of how/whether articles should be edited before approval;
redirected, and rejected is explicitly encouraged.

Yes. You can think of it as the group assumes moderation is acceptable.
The group's topics are, given that premise, how to do it best for the
group in question:. How to moderate effectively, vs whether moderation
is good or not.

This of course is
effectively discussion of what type of moderation is good/bad.

What _type_ vs whether to moderate.

You are just criminal.

All there is to it.

You are simply a disgrace to life force as such.

Any
banned discussion of whether moderation is good or bad can easily be
"No, I'm not saying moderation is bad, just that any rejection of
submissions is not best practice" :)

You point to a grey area - the mods will need to exercise care and
judgement. And being human, I suspect this group will get the odd post
that contains some pro/anti moderation content - such is life.
Thomas

[Terminator]

AFAIK, news.admin.moderation is not an official organ of the B8MB.

Agreed 100%.
n.a.m is not designed to be a court for adjudicating complaints
about moderators or moderation policies.

You are just a clique of cunning, dishonest nazi perverts.
You ignored the ORIGINAL "rfd" on UNMODERATED version of
news.admin.moderation posted half a year ago, and, after
seeing the control messages, your sicko "tzar" Tim Skirvin,
one of the sickest power hungry megalomaniacs in entire
history of usenet, started this scam.

Not only that, but you SPECIFIALLY avoid adding .moderated
to a group name trying to foreve prevent ANY discussions
on this nazi censorship trick you conveniently call
"moderation".

It is simply a sabotage, meant to specifically destroy
the very idea of discussing the issues of censorship
via perverted trick of "moderation".

Simple as that.

And you all KNOW it.

Therefore, you are nothing more than criminal saboteurs
of the biggest global information system called big-8
and your very purpose here is to obliterate the very
idea of Democracy, just like Joseph Stalin, Adolph Hitler
and all other totalitarian dictators did.

Your model of "committee", deciding for all the people
of the planet Earth what is "good" and what is "bad",
is an EXACT model of Stalinist committees slaughtering
utterly innocent people by millions.

Simple stuff. As straightforward as it gets.

My prediction of the future events that the board never will
create such a court. The costs would be enormous and the
benefits few, if any.
I have no power to impose my view of future events on those
who predict other outcomes based on their personal view of
reality. Proving negatives is notoriously difficult in some
cases; proving that some human choices will not be made is
(in my view) utterly impossible.
Marty