Terminator
2007-03-16 04:32:34 UTC
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
moderated group news.groups.proposals
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for a change in the
moderation policy of the Usenet newsgroup, news.groups.proposals.
moderated group news.groups.proposals
This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for a change in the
moderation policy of the Usenet newsgroup, news.groups.proposals.
to your own trap, news.groups.proposals?
First of all, you, nazi puppets of herr fuehrer
Russ Allbery, who created your nazi puppet theatre,
stated many times on record that news.groups has
no significance to your neo-nazi takeover of nothing less
than the world's biggest information system called big-8.
In that case, why are you posting it to news.groups?
Just to insult all those who do not agree with your nazi
agenda? And, by crossposting it to your nazi ngp hole,
you know full well that if they follow up on your post
and do not mofify the followup, you will most certainly
junk any and all views that do not align with your
Stalinist agenda?
You must be perverts then.
The LOWEST grade scum
in the entire history of usenet.
As far as I'm concerned, you can discuss anything you like in a group
I don't read, and it's understandable or even praiseworthy that you
want to increase the range of acceptable topics in a group that hasn't
proved particularly popular so far, despite weeks of propaganda on its
behalf.
However, by your choice of crossposted groups you admit that this RFD
may affect the Big-8 and Usenet in general, so certain ethical issues
arise.
You're a moderator of NGP, and you've set follow-ups to the group you
moderate. This means not only that people wishing to comment on the
RFD who choose not to subscribe to NGP and continue to think that the
proper place for RFD discussions is news.groups are at a disadvantage,
but also that if one wants one's comments to appear in NGP they have
to be approved by a team of moderators that includes the proponent.
There's a conflict of interest there.
Also, any comment on this RFD is likely to be coloured by the
commentor's attitude to the self-proclaimed "Big-8 Management Board",
since NGP is the B8MB's flagship project and its very existence is a
very hot issue between supporters and opponents of that committee.
Since criticism of the B8MB is verboten in NGP (on pain of the
approving moderator being removed by the B8MB), as a moderator you'll
have to reject comments which as a proponent you might find useful.
I'm sure that you, as a sane, honorable and devastatingly good-looking
Usenet participant[1], will do your best to resolve the conflicts of
interest as honestly as possible,
There is no such concepts as conflict of interestI don't read, and it's understandable or even praiseworthy that you
want to increase the range of acceptable topics in a group that hasn't
proved particularly popular so far, despite weeks of propaganda on its
behalf.
However, by your choice of crossposted groups you admit that this RFD
may affect the Big-8 and Usenet in general, so certain ethical issues
arise.
You're a moderator of NGP, and you've set follow-ups to the group you
moderate. This means not only that people wishing to comment on the
RFD who choose not to subscribe to NGP and continue to think that the
proper place for RFD discussions is news.groups are at a disadvantage,
but also that if one wants one's comments to appear in NGP they have
to be approved by a team of moderators that includes the proponent.
There's a conflict of interest there.
Also, any comment on this RFD is likely to be coloured by the
commentor's attitude to the self-proclaimed "Big-8 Management Board",
since NGP is the B8MB's flagship project and its very existence is a
very hot issue between supporters and opponents of that committee.
Since criticism of the B8MB is verboten in NGP (on pain of the
approving moderator being removed by the B8MB), as a moderator you'll
have to reject comments which as a proponent you might find useful.
I'm sure that you, as a sane, honorable and devastatingly good-looking
Usenet participant[1], will do your best to resolve the conflicts of
interest as honestly as possible,
or honesty in dictator's mind.
but the conflicts of interest should
not exist in the first place.
It does not matter to nazis.not exist in the first place.
They can bend reality to the point of obscene.
Follow-ups should have been set to a
suitable group that you don't moderate - which in practice means
news.groups.
Why do they even bother to post this crap to news.groups?suitable group that you don't moderate - which in practice means
news.groups.
This whole thing is just to insult the news.groups
participants.
It is simply a spit into your faces.
Nazi ALWAYS do whatever they please.
I'm leaving NAH in the crosspost because I'd like to know if other
managed hierarchies that are mostly unmoderated would allow a
moderator of a group to channel discussion of changes affecting a
whole hierarchy to his moderated group in this way.
- - -
[1]Dear NAH: Steve pretends to hate it when I compliment him. This is
a news.groups in-joke, which I couldn't resist.
managed hierarchies that are mostly unmoderated would allow a
moderator of a group to channel discussion of changes affecting a
whole hierarchy to his moderated group in this way.
- - -
[1]Dear NAH: Steve pretends to hate it when I compliment him. This is
a news.groups in-joke, which I couldn't resist.